Secret understanding of knowledge vs intellectual capital
Most professionals cannot become rich UNLESS they make the switch from being someone who "applies knowledge" to someone who "designs intellectual capital."
A knowledge applier can be anyone, from the minimum-wage teenage hamburger flipper to the $400-an-hour management consultant.
The critical difference is that the consultant is actually creating intellectual capital (K$) as he works on a client case. This K$ can be in various forms: new methodologies, new ways of working or thinking, new solutions (which can be partly reused to serve a future similar client in a similar industry facing a similar problem).
But what's the difference between "knowledge" and "intellectual capital"?
Knowledge is gun powder: potentially powerful, but presently useless.
Intellectual capital is ammunition: powerful, but useless without a gun.
Structural capital (procedures, systems, methodologies, etc.) is a weapons system: powerful, but useless without ammunition.
(to be continued)
A knowledge applier can be anyone, from the minimum-wage teenage hamburger flipper to the $400-an-hour management consultant.
The critical difference is that the consultant is actually creating intellectual capital (K$) as he works on a client case. This K$ can be in various forms: new methodologies, new ways of working or thinking, new solutions (which can be partly reused to serve a future similar client in a similar industry facing a similar problem).
But what's the difference between "knowledge" and "intellectual capital"?
Knowledge is gun powder: potentially powerful, but presently useless.
Intellectual capital is ammunition: powerful, but useless without a gun.
Structural capital (procedures, systems, methodologies, etc.) is a weapons system: powerful, but useless without ammunition.
(to be continued)
<< Home